Gary stack jacks

ABSTRACT

A material holding apparatus which affixes to the structure ( 1 ) material holding mechanism ( 2 ) support raising mechanism ( 3 ) support bracket mechanism.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application relates to and claims priority from U.S. ProvisionalPatent Application Ser. No. US 60/662,524 filed on Feb. 17, 2005,specifications which are incorporated herein by reference.

FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH

Not Applicable

SEQUENCE LISTING OR PROGRAM

Not Applicable

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION—FIELD OF INVENTION

This invention relates to a method and apparatus to allow for a moresafe, less expensive and more versatile way of placing materials in anelevated area.

BACKGROUND OF INVENTION

In standard commercial construction practices as well as residential useindustry, has seen many new innovations from heavy equipment down to asimple tool. The heavy equipment used is usually rented for a nominalfee if the company can not afford to purchase which many can not. Theequipment is also large and needs to have secondary way of transport.The other way this process has been performed and still is by way ofbruit strength.

Originally, the method was performed by bruit strength or some makeshift process allowing to move large amounts of heavy or bulky materialto elevated areas. Throughout the years construction has undergone manynew advances to make work more safe. Over the years constructionindustry has also seen many advances in cutting production time.

The equipment used today to place heavy and bulky material in cumbersomeareas is limited by terrain and cost. Not only does the terrain causeissues but having a piece of expensive equipment not working is not costeffective for the construction company. Using bruit strength is not safefor the worker or the company owner's workers compensation insurance.The way material is placed in Cumbersome areas in construction today hasa number of disadvantages.

(a) The expensive equipment used isn't cost effective for the owner ofthe company renting the equipment.

(b) The expensive equipment is limited to placement of materials due torough or un travelable terrain

(c) The expensive equipment is limited by way of having to be positionedfor long periods of time.

(d) The expensive equipment in most cases need a secondary mode oftransport.

(e) The use of bruit strength by way of a human is not ergonomicallycorrect.

(f) The use of bruit strength by way of human causes chances for injuryto the worker.

(g) The use of bruit strength by way of human puts the owner of thecompany at risk for a law suit.

(h) The use of bruit strength by way of human puts the Government atrisk for a worker compensation law suit.

BACKGROUND OF INVENTION—OBJECTS AND ADVANTAGES

Accordingly, besides the objects and advantages of the material holdingapparatus described in my above patent, there are many objects andadvantages of the present invention are.

(a) The Gary Stack jacks are in expensive to produce, therefore; makingthe Gary Stack Jacks cost effective.

(b) The Gary Stack Jacks are easily placed in the construction area, theterrain has no effect on the Gary Stack Jacks.

(c) The Gary Stack Jacks are in expensive, therefore; the owner canafford to have them sit in position for long periods amount of time.

(d) The Gary Stack Jacks are small and very easily transported.

(e) The Gary Stack Jacks relieve the use of bruit strength by way ofhanding up heavy and bulky material.

(f) The Gary Stack Jacks relieves the use of bruit strength by way ofhanding up heavy and bulky material, relieving possible injury toemployee.

(g) The Gary Stack Jacks relieves the use of bruit strength by way ofhanding up heavy and bulky material, relieving possible injury toemployee, hence fourth; decreasing law suits to company owners.

(h) The Gary Stack Jacks relieves the use of bruit strength by way ofhanding up heavy and bulky material, relieving possible injury toemployee, hence fourth; decreasing worker compensation cases.

Further objects and advantages are to provide a more cost effective wayof placing heavy and bulk materials in construction areas. Furthermore,to create a more safe way to place heavy and bulky materials in aconstruction area, which in turn should decrease injury and law suitsfrom employees. To add, workers compensation cases should decrease inlieu of not using bruit strength to place heavy and bulky materials in aconstruction zone.

SUMMARY

In accordance with the present invention Gary Stack Jacks are comprisedof a material holding mechanism, support and raising mechanism andsupport bracket mechanism.

DRAWINGS—FIGURES.

FIG. 1 illustrates the Gary Stack Jack and all it's components.

FIG. 2 (1) illustrates the material holding mechanism.

FIG. 2 (2) illustrates the support raising mechanism.

FIG. 2 (3) illustrates the support bracket mechanism.

DRAWINGS—REFERENCE NUMERALS

1 Material holding Mechanism

2 Support raising mechanism

3 Support bracket mechanism

DETAILED DESCRIPTION —FIGS. 1 AND 2—PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

A preferred embodiment of the Gary Stack Jacks present invention isillustrated in FIG. 1 (side view) of all embodiments of the Gary StackJacks consists of FIG. 2 (1) material holding mechanism FIG. 2 (2)support raising mechanism FIG. 2 (3) support bracket mechanism.

The material holding mechanism is adhered to the top of the supportraising mechanism. The support raising mechanism is adhered to thematerial holding mechanism and support bracket mechanism. The supportbracket mechanism is adhered to the support raising mechanism.

Advantages

from the description above a number of advantages of my Gary Stack Jacksbecome evident.

(a) Gary Stack Jacks is more cost effective, no more renting and orbuying expensive equipment for placement of heavy, bulky materials.

(b) Gary Stack Jacks are more efficient, no more having to have asecondary mode of transportation from each job site

(c) Gary stack jacks are more cost effective, no more tying up expensiverental equipment on the construction job.

(d) Gary Stack Jacks relieves the use of bruit strength by way ofhanding up heavy and bulky material.

(e) Gary Stack Jacks relieves the use of bruit strength by way ofhanding up heavy and bulky material, relieving possible injury toemployee.

(f) Gary Stack Jacks relieves the use of bruit strength by way ofhanding up heavy and bulky material, relieving possible injury toemployee, hence fourth; decreasing law suits to company owners.

(g) Gary Stack Jacks relieves the use of bruit strength by way ofhanding up heavy and bulky material, relieving possible injury toemployee, hence fourth; decreasing worker compensation cases.

CONCLUSION, RAMIFICATIONS, AND SCOPE

accordingly, the reader will conclude that the Gary Stack Jacks of thisis invention is far more superior way to moving and holding materialsfor the construction industry used today.

-   -   Gary Stack Jacks will help relieve some of the cost of renting        and or buying expensive equipment, giving the smaller companies        the modalities to compete with the bigger corporate companies.    -   Gary Stack Jacks is far more safe then the way material is moved        today by bruit strength.    -   Gary Stack Jacks are far more cost effective than renting and        paying to have expensive equipment moved to the construction        site.    -   Gary Stack Jacks will relieve some of law suits by way of not        using bruit strength.    -   Gary Stack jack will relieve some of workers compensation by way        of not using bruit strength.

Although the product described above has many specifics, it does notlimit the scope of the invention, but as merely providing illustrationsthrough verbiage as well as drawings of some of patent presentembodiments.

1. A method for affixing a material holding device to a structure, (i)Material holding mechanism (ii) Support raising mechanism (iii) Supportbracket mechanism
 2. A device which affixes to the exterior as well asthe interior wall of a structure, (i) Material holding mechanism (ii)Support raising mechanism (iii) Support bracket mechanism
 3. A devicewhich affixes to the exterior as well as the interior wall of astructure which holds materials, (i) Material holding mechanism (ii)Support raising mechanism (iii) Support bracket mechanism